
A few hours before I board a plane for a lovely trip to Brooklyn, I feel it is time to release some rage upon New York. As a New England sports fan, it is infuriating to turn on the TV, listen to the radio, even glance at a newspaper. ESPN and the New York Times Co. have made it impossible to go five minutes without hearing a "feel-good" story about the Jets/Knicks/Giants, and dare I say it, even the Mets. All New York franchises are turned into media darlings by every major sports outlet, and I am sick and tired of it. All NY franchises are completely over-hyped, and given WAY too much credit for their own good. For instance, the media harped about Amare Stoudamire's 26-game 20+ point streak all throughout December and early January, but guess what? During that 26 game stretch, the Knicks went just 15-11, and FELL 6.5 games further behind the Celtics, who went 22-5 during that stretch. But no, all we hear about is how great the Knicks are, how they are "returning" to glory, blah blah blah. Seemingly forgotten by NY fans is that the Knicks haven't won an NBA championship since 1973, and only have 2 titles in 65 years of existence. The "glory days" of the Knicks in the 90's? No such thing. They wont two conference titles (1994 & 1999), and lost to the Rockets and Spurs in the Finals. All of the big name players the Knicks acquire, bought, and drafted cannot make up for the fact that they are behind Boston, LA, Chicago, San Antonio, Philly, Detroit, and Golden State in Finals victories. It is impossible to understand all the praise for a franchise that has employed the likes of Patrick Ewing, John Starks, Charles Oakley, Willis Reed, Walt Frazier, Allan Houston, Latrell Sprewell, Marcus Camby, etc., only to show a grand total of ZERO titles in 37 years. Maybe the argument can be made that dynasties such as the Bulls, Lakers, and Celtics have been the only thing that stood in the Knicks' way. BUT since 1973, eleven other teams have won NBA titles. I don't see Portland, Seattle, San Antonio, or Detroit making excuses that some of the NBA's all-time greats stood in their way. But because the pathetic Knickerbockers are located in New York, is it ASTONISHING to NBA analysts and fans alike that they have gone almost half a century without a title.
But that is plenty of Knick-bashing. The real focus of this rant is the Jets. The lone Super Bowl-winning Jets. The Jets who haven't won anything of importance since the 1970 AFL-NFL merger. IN FACT, the J-E-T-S haven't even appeared in a Super Bowl since their 1969 victory, and of the 32 current NFL franchises, 18 teams have more Super Bowl appearances. Only the Lions, Browns, Texans, and Jaguars have fewer conference titles than the Jets. Even the 1995 Carolina Panthers and 1996 Baltimore Ravens expansion teams have more appearances since the merger than the lowly Jets. In their history, the Jets have just 2 players that were on the team for more then 4 seasons in the Hall of Fame. And just to diminish that feat, Joe Namath is arguably the worst QB (and maybe player) in the Hall of Fame. He finished his career with 47 more interceptions than touchdowns, and has the lowest QB rating of any player in the Hall, at 65.5. To put that into today's perspective, the only qualifying QB in the 2010 season with a rating lower than Namath's is Jimmy Clausen, who posted a 58.4 rating. That means the likes of Derek Anderson, Chad Henne, Shaun Hill, and Jon Kitna posted better seasons than Namath averaged in his career. The Jets other true HOFer? Wide receiver Don Maynard played for the Jets from 1960-1972, accruing only 2 seasons in the merger-era. Unlike Namath, he posted respectable numbers, ranking 20th all-time in receiving yardage and 10th in touchdowns. But even those rankings will be insignificant in the next decade, as the likes of Reggie Wayne, Antonio Gates, Hines Ward, Anquan Boldin, and Larry Fitzgerald will all pass Maynard in touchdowns and/or yardage. Basically, it is safe to say the Jets haven't hosted very many prolific players in their tenure.
The most irking trait of the Jets this year was their sense of entitlement. As a die-hard Patriots fan, I understand the Jets fairly beat the Patriots in the playoffs. To the Patriots credit, they were and always will be the better team, but when it comes to game day anything can happen. What is irritating is all of the trash-talking, low blows, and complete bullshit coming from Jets like Antonio Cromartie, David Harris, Rex Ryan, and even totally insignificant players such as James Ihedigbo and Eric Smith. They seem to forget they went 11-5, barely nabbed the final AFC playoff slot, and now have lost consecutive AFC title games. You don't see more entitled teams like the Patriots and Steelers continuously harping on their opponents - they just put up and shut up. Look at the past decade; the Jets haven't won the division, had 6 wild card berths, went a combined 82-78 in the regular season, and posted only four double-digit win seasons. The Patriots went 121-39 in the same period of time, winning 8 division titles, going 14-5 in the playoffs, and winning 3 of 4 Super Bowls. The Colts and Steelers also posted much better numbers, as seen in the attached image. Pending this week's Packers-Steelers Super Bowl matchup, if the Steelers win then the threesome of New England, Indy, and Pitt won 7 of 10 Super Bowls in the decade. That is extremely impressive for a league known for parody and upsets, much ado to the salary cap. But still, washed up veterans to the likes of LaDainian Tomlinson, Jason Taylor, Shaun Ellis, Trevor Pryce, and Kris Jenkins all came into the 2010 season as the self-proclaimed favorites, forgetting that they play for a franchise that has not and never will be anything but a middle-tier team.


